↓ Skip to main content

Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Shared decision making for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2178-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marleen Kunneman, Megan E. Branda, Peter A. Noseworthy, Mark Linzer, Bruce Burnett, Sara Dick, Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla, Cara A. Fernandez, Haeshik Gorr, Mike Wambua, Shelly Keune, Claudia Zeballos-Palacios, Ian Hargraves, Nilay D. Shah, Victor M. Montori

Abstract

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common ongoing health problem that places patients at risk of stroke. Whether and how a patient addresses this risk depends on each patient's goals, context, and values. Consequently, leading cardiovascular societies recommend using shared decision making (SDM) to individualize antithrombotic treatment in patients with AF. The aim of this study is to assess the extent to which the ANTICOAGULATION CHOICE conversation tool promotes high-quality SDM and influences anticoagulation uptake and adherence in patients with AF at risk of strokes. This study protocol describes a multicenter, encounter-level, randomized trial to assess the effect of using the ANTICOAGULATION CHOICE conversation tool in the clinical encounter, compared to usual care. The participating centers include an academic hospital system, a suburban community group practice, and an urban safety net hospital, all in Minnesota, USA. Patients with ongoing nonvalvular AF at risk of strokes (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 in men, or ≥ 2 in women) will be eligible for participation. We aim to include 999 patients and their clinicians. The primary outcome is the quality of SDM as perceived by participants, and as assessed by a post-encounter survey that ascertains (a) knowledge transfer, (b) concordance of the decision made, (c) quality of communication, and (d) satisfaction with the decision-making process. Recordings of encounters will be reviewed to assess the extent of patient involvement and how participants use the tool (fidelity). Anticoagulant use, choice of agent, and adherence will be drawn from patients' medical and pharmacy records. Strokes and bleeding events will be drawn from patient records. This study will provide a valid and precise measure of the effect of the ANTICOAGULATION CHOICE conversation tool on SDM quality and processes, and on the treatment choices and adherence to therapy among AF patients at risk of stroke. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02905032 . Registered on 9 September 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 48 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 18%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 56 36%