You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
How equal is the relationship between individual social capital and psychological distress? A gendered analysis using cross-sectional data from Ghent (Belgium)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-960 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Veerle Vyncke, Wim Hardyns, Wim Peersman, Lieven Pauwels, Peter Groenewegen, Sara Willems |
Abstract |
Social capital has been related to various aspects of health. While literature suggests that men and women differently access and mobilize social capital, gender has received little attention within social capital research. This study examines whether the association between individual social capital and psychological distress is different for men and women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Belgium | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
Unspecified | 7 | 9% |
Other | 14 | 18% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 15 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 15% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
Unspecified | 7 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 16% |
Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,200,249
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,314
of 14,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,253
of 225,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#197
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.