You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physician payment methods: a focus on quality and cost control
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40463-014-0034-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luke Rudmik, Dominika Wranik, Caroline Rudisill-Michaelsen |
| Abstract |
With rising health care costs, governments must develop innovative methods to deliver efficient and equitable health care services. With physician remuneration being the third largest health care expense, the design of remuneration methods is a priority in health care policy. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck surgeons should have an understanding of the behavioural incentives associated with different physician payment methods. This article will outline the different physician payment methods with a focus on discussing the impact on quality of care and health care costs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 24% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 40 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,333,503
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#104
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,390
of 241,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.