↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of prevalence and diversity of avian malaria infections in wild Culex pipiens mosquitoes: the effects of Wolbachia, filarial nematodes and insecticide resistance

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamics of prevalence and diversity of avian malaria infections in wild Culex pipiens mosquitoes: the effects of Wolbachia, filarial nematodes and insecticide resistance
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flore Zélé, Juilen Vézilier, Gregory L’Ambert, Antoine Nicot, Sylvain Gandon, Ana Rivero, Olivier Duron

Abstract

Identifying the parasites transmitted by a particular vector and the factors that render this vector susceptible to the parasite are key steps to understanding disease transmission. Although avian malaria has become a model system for the investigation of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of Plasmodium parasites, little is still known about the field prevalence, diversity and distribution of avian Plasmodium species within the vectors, or about the extrinsic factors affecting Plasmodium population dynamics in the wild.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Unknown 132 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 21%
Researcher 29 20%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 50%
Environmental Science 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,447
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,513
of 246,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#43
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.