↓ Skip to main content

Changes in energy expenditure associated with ingestion of high protein, high fat versus high protein, low fat meals among underweight, normal weight, and overweight females

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in energy expenditure associated with ingestion of high protein, high fat versus high protein, low fat meals among underweight, normal weight, and overweight females
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2007
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-6-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Jo Riggs, Barry D White, Sareen S Gropper

Abstract

Metabolic rate is known to rise above basal levels after eating, especially following protein consumption. Yet, this postprandial rise in metabolism appears to vary among individuals. This study examined changes in energy expenditure in response to ingestion of a high protein, high fat (HPHF) meal versus an isocaloric high protein, low fat (HPLF) meal in underweight, normal weight, or overweight females (n = 21) aged 19-28 years.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 3%
Colombia 1 2%
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 51 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Computer Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#849,929
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#246
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,484
of 77,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.