You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toward better benchmarking: challenge-based methods assessment in cancer genomics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Biology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13059-014-0462-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul C Boutros, Adam A Margolin, Joshua M Stuart, Andrea Califano, Gustavo Stolovitzky |
Abstract |
Rapid technological development has created an urgent need for improved evaluation of algorithms for the analysis of cancer genomics data. We outline how challenge-based assessment may help fill this gap by leveraging crowd-sourcing to distribute effort and reduce bias. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 26% |
New Zealand | 2 | 9% |
Sweden | 2 | 9% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
China | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 12 | 52% |
Members of the public | 10 | 43% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Cuba | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 18% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 8 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 33% |
Computer Science | 20 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 18% |
Engineering | 6 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#2,651,120
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,101
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,146
of 259,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#27
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.