You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deletions of exons with regulatory activity at the DYNC1I1 locus are associated with split-hand/split-foot malformation: array CGH screening of 134 unrelated families
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13023-014-0108-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Naeimeh Tayebi, Aleksander Jamsheer, Ricarda Flöttmann, Anna Sowinska-Seidler, Sandra C Doelken, Barbara Oehl-Jaschkowitz, Wiebke Hülsemann, Rolf Habenicht, Eva Klopocki, Stefan Mundlos, Malte Spielmann |
| Abstract |
A growing number of non-coding regulatory mutations are being identified in congenital disease. Very recently also some exons of protein coding genes have been identified to act as tissue specific enhancer elements and were therefore termed exonic enhancers or "eExons". |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 32% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 45% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#5,558,128
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#674
of 2,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,672
of 228,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#16
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.