↓ Skip to main content

Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome types I and II

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome types I and II
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0138-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jair Tenorio, Pedro Arias, Víctor Martínez-Glez, Fernando Santos, Sixto García-Miñaur, Julián Nevado, Pablo Lapunzina

Abstract

Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome (SGBS) is a rare overgrowth syndrome clinically characterized by multiple congenital abnormalities, pre/postnatal overgrowth, distinctive craniofacial features, macrocephaly, and organomegaly. Abnormalities of the skeletal system, heart, central nervous system, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract may also be observed. Intellectual disability, early motor milestones and speech delay are sometimes present; however, there are a considerable number of individuals with normal intelligence.Genomic rearrangements and point mutations involving the glypican-3 gene (GPC3) at Xq26 have been shown to be associated with SGBS. Occasionally, these rearrangements also include the glypican-4 gene (GPC4). Glypicans are heparan sulfate proteoglycans which have a role in the control of cell growth and cell division.Although a lethal and infrequent form (also known as SGBS type II) has been described, only the classical form of SGBS is reviewed in this work, whereas only some specific features on SGBS type II are commented.We review all clinical and molecular aspects of this rare disorder, updating many topics and suggest a follow-up scheme for geneticists and primary care clinicians.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 26 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,870,394
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#204
of 2,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,482
of 255,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.