↓ Skip to main content

Group versus individual sessions delivered by a physiotherapist for female urinary incontinence: an interview study with women attending group sessions nested within a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group versus individual sessions delivered by a physiotherapist for female urinary incontinence: an interview study with women attending group sessions nested within a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMC Women's Health, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-9-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frances Griffiths, Jo Pepper, Ellen C Jørstad-Stein, Jan Fereday Smith, Lesley Hill, Sarah (Sallie) E Lamb

Abstract

The aim was to explore the concerns and expectations of women invited to attend group physiotherapy sessions for the management of female urinary incontinence and whether the experience changed their views; and to gather recommendations from women attending group sessions on the design and delivery of these sessions

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ukraine 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2014.
All research outputs
#12,903,654
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#878
of 1,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,426
of 91,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.