You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Activated coagulation time vs. intrinsically activated modified rotational thromboelastometry in assessment of hemostatic disturbances and blood loss after protamine administration in elective cardiac surgery: analysis from the clinical trial (NCT01281397)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-9-129 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mate Petricevic, Bojan Biocina, Davor Milicic, Lucija Svetina, Marko Boban, Ante Lekić, Sanja Konosic, Milan Milosevic, Hrvoje Gasparovic |
Abstract |
Excessive bleeding after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is risk factor for adverse outcomes after elective cardiac surgery (ECS). Although many different point-of-care devices to diagnose hemostatic disturbances after CPB are available, the best test is still unclear. The study aim was to compare the accuracy of hemostatic disorder detection between two point-of-care devices. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Croatia | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 65 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Researcher | 10 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 45% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2014.
All research outputs
#4,166,396
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#52
of 1,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,495
of 249,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,222 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.