You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Six-month low level chlorine dioxide gas inhalation toxicity study with two-week recovery period in rats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6673-7-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akinori Akamatsu, Cheolsung Lee, Hirofumi Morino, Takanori Miura, Norio Ogata, Takashi Shibata |
| Abstract |
Chlorine dioxide (CD) gas has a potent antimicrobial activity at extremely low concentration and may serve as a new tool for infection control occupationally as well as publicly. However, it remains unknown whether the chronic exposure of CD gas concentration effective against microbes is safe. Therefore, long-term, low concentration CD gas inhalation toxicity was studied in rats as a six-month continuous whole-body exposure followed by a two-week recovery period, so as to prove that the CD gas exposed up to 0.1 ppm (volume ratio) is judged as safe on the basis of a battery of toxicological examinations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 23% |
| Peru | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 56 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 91 | 95% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 22% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#532,051
of 25,670,640 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#15
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,332
of 169,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,670,640 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them