You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative short-term safety of bolus versus maintenance iron dosing in hemodialysis patients: a replication study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Nephrology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2369-15-154 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Janet K Freburger, Alan R Ellis, Abhijit V Kshirsagar, Lily Wang, M Alan Brookhart |
Abstract |
Recent research has reported that patients receiving bolus (frequent large doses to achieve iron repletion) versus maintenance dosing of iron have an increased short-term risk of infection, but a similar risk of cardiovascular events. We sought to determine whether these findings could be replicated using the same methods and a different data source. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 27% |
Mexico | 3 | 27% |
Canada | 1 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 27% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Scientists | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 17% |
Researcher | 5 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 53% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#4,708,827
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#524
of 2,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,283
of 252,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#5
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.