You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrating national community-based health worker programmes into health systems: a systematic review identifying lessons learned from low-and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-987 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Mumba Zulu, John Kinsman, Charles Michelo, Anna-Karin Hurtig |
| Abstract |
Despite the development of national community-based health worker (CBHW) programmes in several low- and middle-income countries, their integration into health systems has not been optimal. Studies have been conducted to investigate the factors influencing the integration processes, but systematic reviews to provide a more comprehensive understanding are lacking. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 316 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 64 | 20% |
| Researcher | 53 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 21% |
| Unknown | 56 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 71 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 68 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,599,559
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,748
of 14,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,898
of 251,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#31
of 282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.