↓ Skip to main content

Trace elements in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
232 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trace elements in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medicine, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-7-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcello Tonelli, Natasha Wiebe, Brenda Hemmelgarn, Scott Klarenbach, Catherine Field, Braden Manns, Ravi Thadhani, John Gill, The Alberta Kidney Disease Network

Abstract

Hemodialysis patients are at risk for deficiency of essential trace elements and excess of toxic trace elements, both of which can affect health. We conducted a systematic review to summarize existing literature on trace element status in hemodialysis patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 152 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Researcher 16 10%
Other 15 10%
Professor 9 6%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 40 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Chemistry 5 3%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,397,563
of 24,312,464 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,176
of 3,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,132
of 100,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,312,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.