You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Population impact of a high cardiovascular risk management program delivered by village doctors in rural China: design and rationale of a large, cluster-randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-345 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lijing L Yan, Weigang Fang, Elizabeth Delong, Bruce Neal, Eric D Peterson, Yining Huang, Ningling Sun, Chen Yao, Xian Li, Stephen MacMahon, Yangfeng Wu |
Abstract |
The high-risk strategy has been proven effective in preventing cardiovascular disease; however, the population benefits from these interventions remain unknown. This study aims to assess, at the population level, the effects of an evidence-based high cardiovascular risk management program delivered by village doctors in rural China. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 17% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 29% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 34 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,942,562
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,323
of 14,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,287
of 226,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#118
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.