↓ Skip to main content

High sensitivity troponin T and I reflect mitral annular plane systolic excursion being assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Medical Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High sensitivity troponin T and I reflect mitral annular plane systolic excursion being assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40001-017-0281-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michèle Natale, Michael Behnes, Seung-Hyun Kim, Julia Hoffmann, Nadine Reckord, Ursula Hoffmann, Johannes Budjan, Siegfried Lang, Martin Borggrefe, Theano Papavassiliu, Thomas Bertsch, Ibrahim Akin

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the association between high sensitivity troponins (hsTn) and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) in patients undergoing cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). Patients undergoing cMRI were prospectively enrolled. Patients with right ventricular dysfunction (< 50%) were excluded. Blood samples for measurements of hsTn and amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were collected at the time of cMRI. 84 patients were included. Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 59% (IQR 51-64%). HsTn were correlated inversely with MAPSE within multivariable linear regression models (hsTnI: Beta - 0.19; T - 1.96; p = 0.05; hsTnT: Beta - 0.26; T - 3.26; p = 0.002). HsTn increased significantly according to decreasing stages of impaired MAPSE (p < 0.003). HsTn discriminated patients with impaired MAPSE < 11 mm (hsTnT: AUC = 0.67; p = 0.008; hsTnI: AUC = 0.64; p = 0.03) and < 8 mm (hsTnT: AUC = 0.79; p = 0.0001; hsTnI: AUC = 0.75; p = 0.001) and were still significantly associated in multivariable logistic regression models with impaired MAPSE < 11 mm (hsTnT: OR = 4.71; p = 0.002; hsTnI: OR = 4.22; p = 0.009). This study demonstrates that hsTn are able to reflect MAPSE being assessed by cMRI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 75%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#728
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,905
of 331,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.