↓ Skip to main content

Participants’ understanding of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) through informed consent procedures in the RCT for breast cancer screening, J-START

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Participants’ understanding of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) through informed consent procedures in the RCT for breast cancer screening, J-START
Published in
Trials, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoko Narikawa Shiono, Ying-Fang Zheng, Masahiro Kikuya, Masaaki Kawai, Takanori Ishida, Shinichi Kuriyama, Noriaki Ohuchi

Abstract

It is often difficult to enrol healthy volunteers into a randomized controlled trial (RCT) as there are barriers to participants' proper understanding of a trial. This study aimed to evaluate degrees of understanding of the informed consent (IC) process among healthy volunteers who participated in an RCT. Additionally, factors associated with degree of understanding were investigated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 6 8%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 17%
Psychology 6 8%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 17 22%