↓ Skip to main content

An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An international comparison of deceased and living organ donation/transplant rates in opt-in and opt-out systems: a panel study
Published in
BMC Medicine, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0131-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee Shepherd, Ronan E O’Carroll, Eamonn Ferguson

Abstract

Policy decisions about opt-in and opt-out consent for organ donation are based on limited evidence. To fill this gap we investigated the difference between deceased and living organ donation rates in opt-in and opt-out consent systems across a 13 year period. We controlled for extensive covariates and estimated the causal effect of consent with instrumental variables analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 330 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 80 24%
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 9%
Researcher 27 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 75 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 10%
Social Sciences 23 7%
Psychology 20 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 18 5%
Other 74 22%
Unknown 89 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#254,804
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#222
of 4,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,288
of 264,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#5
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.