You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Left ventricular torsion shear angle volume analysis in patients with hypertension: a global approach for LV diastolic function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0070-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chun G Schiros, Ravi V Desai, Bharath Ambale Venkatesh, Krishna K Gaddam, Shilpi Agarwal, Steven G Lloyd, David A Calhoun, Thomas S Denney, Louis J Dell’italia, Himanshu Gupta |
| Abstract |
Torsion shear angle φ is an important measure of left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic functions. Here we provide a novel index utilizing LV normalized torsion shear angle φ^ volume V^ loop to assess LV diastolic functional properties. We defined the area within φ^V^ loop as torsion hysteresis area, and hypothesized that it may be an important global parameter of diastolic function. We evaluated the φ^ changes to increased V^ during early diastole -dφ^/dV^ as a potential measure of LV suction. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 32% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 21% |
| Researcher | 4 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 42% |
| Engineering | 3 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,138,010
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#934
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,895
of 264,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#21
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.