↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative laser angiography using the SPY system: review of the literature and recommendations for use

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraoperative laser angiography using the SPY system: review of the literature and recommendations for use
Published in
Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1164-7-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffrey C Gurtner, Glyn E Jones, Peter C Neligan, Martin I Newman, Brett T Phillips, Justin M Sacks, Michael R Zenn

Abstract

Inadequate tissue perfusion is a key contributor to early complications following reconstructive procedures. Accurate and reliable intraoperative evaluation of tissue perfusion is critical to reduce complications and improve clinical outcomes. Clinical judgment is the most commonly used method for evaluating blood supply, but when used alone, is not always completely reliable. A variety of other methodologies have been evaluated, including Doppler devices, tissue oximetry, and fluorescein, among others. However, none have achieved widespread acceptance. Recently, intraoperative laser angiography using indocyanine green was introduced to reconstructive surgery. This vascular imaging technology provides real-time assessment of tissue perfusion that correlates with clinical outcomes and can be used to guide surgical decision making. Although this technology has been used for decades in other areas, surgeons may not be aware of its utility for perfusion assessment in reconstructive surgery. A group of experts with extensive experience with intraoperative laser angiography convened to identify key issues in perfusion assessment, review available methodologies, and produce initial recommendations for the use of this technology in reconstructive procedures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 15%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Engineering 5 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,950,811
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#3
of 35 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,390
of 281,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Innovation and Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them