↓ Skip to main content

A chance to stop and breathe: participants’ experiences in the North American Opiate Medication Initiative clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A chance to stop and breathe: participants’ experiences in the North American Opiate Medication Initiative clinical trial
Published in
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1940-0640-9-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes, Kirsten Marchand, Kurt Lock, Jill Chettiar, David C Marsh, Suzanne Brissette, Aslam H Anis, Martin T Schechter

Abstract

The North American Opiate Medication Initiative (NAOMI) clinical trial compared the effectiveness of injectable diacetylmorphine (DAM) or hydromorphone (HDM) to oral methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). This study aimed to determine participants' perceptions of treatment delivered in NAOMI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Other 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 27%
Social Sciences 8 12%
Psychology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#456
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,035
of 264,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.