You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A test for reporting bias in trial networks: simulation and case studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-112 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ludovic Trinquart, John PA Ioannidis, Gilles Chatellier, Philippe Ravaud |
Abstract |
Networks of trials assessing several treatment options available for the same condition are increasingly considered. Randomized trial evidence may be missing because of reporting bias. We propose a test for reporting bias in trial networks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 17% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Norway | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 28% |
Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
Professor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 11% |
Other | 9 | 19% |
Unknown | 3 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 47% |
Psychology | 4 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 17% |
Unknown | 7 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,102,927
of 24,312,464 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,171
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,751
of 257,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,312,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.