You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative genome analysis of entomopathogenic fungi reveals a complex set of secreted proteins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-822 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charley Christian Staats, Ângela Junges, Rafael Lucas Muniz Guedes, Claudia Elizabeth Thompson, Guilherme Loss de Morais, Juliano Tomazzoni Boldo, Luiz Gonzaga Paula de Almeida, Fábio Carrer Andreis, Alexandra Lehmkuhl Gerber, Nicolau Sbaraini, Rana Louise de Andrade da Paixão, Leonardo Broetto, Melissa Landell, Lucélia Santi, Walter Orlando Beys-da-Silva, Carolina Pereira Silveira, Thaiane Rispoli Serrano, Eder Silva de Oliveira, Lívia Kmetzsch, Marilene Henning Vainstein, Ana Tereza Ribeiro de Vasconcelos, Augusto Schrank |
| Abstract |
Metarhizium anisopliae is an entomopathogenic fungus used in the biological control of some agricultural insect pests, and efforts are underway to use this fungus in the control of insect-borne human diseases. A large repertoire of proteins must be secreted by M. anisopliae to cope with the various available nutrients as this fungus switches through different lifestyles, i.e., from a saprophytic, to an infectious, to a plant endophytic stage. To further evaluate the predicted secretome of M. anisopliae, we employed genomic and transcriptomic analyses, coupled with phylogenomic analysis, focusing on the identification and characterization of secreted proteins. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Researcher | 21 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,821,622
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,810
of 10,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,855
of 254,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#117
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.