↓ Skip to main content

Strategies to facilitate implementation and sustainability of large system transformations: a case study of a national program for improving quality of care for elderly people

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies to facilitate implementation and sustainability of large system transformations: a case study of a national program for improving quality of care for elderly people
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-401
Pubmed ID
Authors

Monica Elisabeth Nyström, Helena Strehlenert, Johan Hansson, Henna Hasson

Abstract

Large-scale change initiatives stimulating change in several organizational systems in the health and social care sector are challenging both to lead and evaluate. There is a lack of systematic research that can enrich our understanding of strategies to facilitate large system transformations in this sector. The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of core activities and strategies to facilitate implementation and change of a national program aimed at improving life for the most ill elderly people in Sweden. The program outcomes were also addressed to assess the impact of these strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 22%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 36 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 19 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 41 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,923,083
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,335
of 8,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,965
of 260,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#44
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.