↓ Skip to main content

Resilience to trauma in the two largest cities of Brazil: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resilience to trauma in the two largest cities of Brazil: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12888-014-0257-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liliane Vilete, Ivan Figueira, Sérgio Baxter Andreoli, Wagner Ribeiro, Maria Ines Quintana, Jair de Jesus Mari, Evandro Silva Freire Coutinho

Abstract

BackgroundResilience is a dynamic process involving the interaction between intrapsychic and social factors of risk and protection. For resilience to be recognized there must be a significant threat to the individual, such as a traumatic event, and a good quality of adjustment. The aim of this study was to identify predisposing factors and possible mechanisms associated with resilience to traumatic events in the general population.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study with a random sample, aged 15¿75 years, living in the two largest cities in Brazil, who were exposed to trauma (N¿=¿3,231). Positive adaptation to trauma was defined as the lifetime absence of anxiety (including posttraumatic stress disorder), depression and alcohol related disorders in the presence of at least one traumatic event. Logistic regression models predicting resilience were used to estimate the incidence density ratio. This measure expresses the extent to which the rate of resilience differs from the exposed group to the non-exposed group. Moreover, we explored the relationship between positive/negative affect and resilience, using linear regression models.ResultsMale gender was a predisposing factor to positive adaptation (incidence density ratio [IDR]¿=¿1.34; p¿<¿0.001). There was an inverse linear relationship between childhood violence and resilience (IDR¿=¿0.67; 0.53; 0.19; p¿<¿0.001). Our findings suggest that the absence of parental mental disease (IDR¿=¿1.35; p¿=¿0.07) also predisposes individuals to positive adaptation.ConclusionsThis study provides results that help to identify vulnerable groups and protective factors that may lead to a positive adaptation following traumatic experiences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 18%
Lecturer 23 11%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Other 45 22%
Unknown 39 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 16%
Social Sciences 16 8%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 51 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,306,466
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,356
of 4,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,599
of 225,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#51
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.