↓ Skip to main content

Diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis in alkaptonuria

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnosis of secondary amyloidosis in alkaptonuria
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13000-014-0185-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lia Millucci, Lorenzo Ghezzi, Giulia Bernardini, Daniela Braconi, Pietro Lupetti, Federico Perfetto, Maurizio Orlandini, Annalisa Santucci

Abstract

Alkaptonuria (AKU) is an inborn error of catabolism due to a deficient activity of homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase. Patients suffer from a severe arthropathy, cardiovascular and kidney disease but other organs are affected, too. We found secondary amyloidosis as a life-threatening complication in AKU, thus opening new perspectives for its treatment. We proved that methotrexate and anti-oxidants have an excellent efficacy to inhibit the production of amyloid in AKU model chondrocytes. Owing to the progressive and intractable condition, it seems important to detect amyloid deposits at an early phase in AKU and the choice of specimens for a correct diagnosis is crucial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,466
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#535
of 1,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,397
of 252,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#14
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.