You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Open-access synthetic spike-in mRNA-seq data for cancer gene fusions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-15-824 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Waibhav D Tembe, Stephanie JK Pond, Christophe Legendre, Han-Yu Chuang, Winnie S Liang, Nancy E Kim, Valerie Montel, Shukmei Wong, Timothy K McDaniel, David W Craig, John D Carpten |
| Abstract |
Oncogenic fusion genes underlie the mechanism of several common cancers. Next-generation sequencing based RNA-seq analyses have revealed an increasing number of recurrent fusions in a variety of cancers. However, absence of a publicly available gene-fusion focused RNA-seq data impedes comparative assessment and collaborative development of novel gene fusions detection algorithms. We have generated nine synthetic poly-adenylated RNA transcripts that correspond to previously reported oncogenic gene fusions. These synthetic RNAs were spiked at known molarity over a wide range into total RNA prior to construction of next-generation sequencing mRNA libraries to generate RNA-seq data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 28% |
| France | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 34% |
| Researcher | 16 | 32% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 22% |
| Engineering | 4 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,299,472
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#217
of 11,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,904
of 265,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#7
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,292 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.