You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Re-contacting participants for inclusion in the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP): Findings from three case-control studies of lung cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Genome Medicine, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13073-014-0054-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michele L Cote, M Jay Harrison, Angela S Wenzlaff, Ann G Schwartz |
Abstract |
Since January 2008, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has required that all investigators who receive NIH support submit de-identified high-throughput genomic data to the database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of re-consenting participants from three inactive studies, conducted from 2000 through 2009, to submit their data to dbGaP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Librarian | 1 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Computer Science | 2 | 17% |
Philosophy | 1 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#15,306,972
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,313
of 1,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,283
of 228,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,437 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.