↓ Skip to main content

A phyloclimatic study of Cyclamen

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A phyloclimatic study of Cyclamen
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-6-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Yesson, Alastair Culham

Abstract

The impact of global climate change on plant distribution, speciation and extinction is of current concern. Examining species climatic preferences via bioclimatic niche modelling is a key tool to study this impact. There is an established link between bioclimatic niche models and phylogenetic diversification. A next step is to examine future distribution predictions from a phylogenetic perspective. We present such a study using Cyclamen (Myrsinaceae), a group which demonstrates morphological and phenological adaptations to its seasonal Mediterranean-type climate. How will the predicted climate change affect future distribution of this popular genus of garden plants?

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Switzerland 6 2%
Germany 5 1%
Brazil 5 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 293 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 78 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 20%
Student > Master 50 15%
Student > Bachelor 24 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 71 21%
Unknown 27 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 212 62%
Environmental Science 58 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Arts and Humanities 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 38 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,496,106
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,439
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,360
of 87,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.