You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparative effectiveness trial of postoperative management for lumbar spine surgery: changing behavior through physical therapy (CBPT) study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-325 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristin R Archer, Rogelio A Coronado, Christine M Haug, Susan W Vanston, Clinton J Devin, Christopher J Fonnesbeck, Oran S Aaronson, Joseph S Cheng, Richard L Skolasky, Lee H Riley, Stephen T Wegener |
| Abstract |
The United States has the highest rate of lumbar spine surgery in the world, with rates increasing over 200% since 1990. Medicare spends over $1 billion annually on lumbar spine surgery. Despite surgical advances, up to 40% of patients report chronic pain and disability following surgery. Our work has demonstrated that fear of movement is a risk factor for increased pain and disability and decreased physical function in patients following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions. Cognitive-behavioral therapy and self-management treatments have the potential to address psychosocial risk factors and improve outcomes after spine surgery, but are unavailable or insufficiently adapted for postoperative care. Our research team developed a cognitive-behavioral based self-management approach to postoperative rehabilitation (Changing Behavior through Physical Therapy (CBPT)). Pilot testing of the CBPT program demonstrated greater improvement in pain, disability, physical and mental health, and physical performance compared to education. The current study compares which of two treatments provided by telephone - a CBPT Program or an Education Program about postoperative recovery - are more effective for improving patient-centered outcomes in adults following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 284 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
| Researcher | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 45 | 16% |
| Unknown | 88 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 17% |
| Psychology | 31 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 7% |
| Unknown | 99 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2015.
All research outputs
#13,413,791
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,910
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,977
of 253,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#28
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.