↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the impact of refrigeration on next generation sequencing-based assessment of the canine and feline fecal microbiota

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of the impact of refrigeration on next generation sequencing-based assessment of the canine and feline fecal microbiota
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12917-014-0230-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Scott Weese, Mohammad Jalali

Abstract

BackgroundEvaluation of factors that might impact microbiota assessment is important to avoid spurious results, particularly in field and multicenter studies where sample collection may occur distant from the laboratory. This study evaluated the impact of refrigeration on next generation sequence-based assessment of the canine and feline fecal microbiota. Fecal samples were collected from seven dogs and ten cats, and analysed at baseline and after 3, 7, 10 and 14 days of storage at 4°C.ResultsThere were no differences in community membership or population structure between timepoints for either dogs or cats, nor were there any differences in richness, diversity and evenness. There were few differences in relative abundance of phyla or predominant genera, with the only differences being significant increases in Actinobacteria between Days 0-14 (P¿=¿0.0184) and 1-14 (P¿=¿0.0182) for canine samples, and a decrease in Erysipelotrichaceae incertae sedis between Day 0 and Day 7 (median 4.9 vs 2.2%, P¿=¿0.046) in feline samples.Linear discriminant analysis effect size and indicator analysis identified a small number of genera that were over-represented in, or defining characteristics of, Day 14 samples. These were predominantly Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, with Psychrobacter and Arthrobacter enriched in both canine and feline Day 14 samples.ConclusionsStorage for at least 14 days at 4°C has limited impact on culture-independent assessment of the canine and feline fecal microbiota, although changes in some individual groups may occur.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
New Zealand 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 34%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#14,201,538
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#1,107
of 3,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,730
of 252,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#24
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,043 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.