Title |
A convenient UHPLC-MS/MS method for routine monitoring of plasma and brain levels of nicotine and cotinine as a tool to validate newly developed preclinical smoking model in mouse
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12868-017-0389-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohammad A. Kaisar, Raja Reddy Kallem, Ravi K. Sajja, Ali Ehsan Sifat, Luca Cucullo |
Abstract |
A sensitive, rapid and selective UHPLC-MS/MS method has been developed and validated for the quantification of Nicotine (NT) and Cotinine (CN) using Continine-d 3 as internal standard (IS) as per FDA guidelines. Sample preparation involved simple protein precipitation of 20 µL mouse plasma or brain homogenate using acetonitrile at 1:8 ratio. Mass Spectrometer was operated in positive polarity under the multiple reaction-monitoring mode using electro spray ionization technique and the transitions of m/z 163.2 → 132.1, 177.2 → 98.0 and 180.2 → 101.2 were used to measure the NT, CN and IS, respectively. The elution of NT, CN and IS are at 1.89, 1.77 and 1.76 min, respectively. This was achieved with a gradient mobile phase consisting of 5 mM ammonium bicarbonate, acetonitrile and methanol (3:1, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min on a Kinetex EVO C18 column. The method was validated with a lower limit of quantitation 3.0 ng/mL in mouse plasma and brain for both the analytes. A linear response function was established for the range of concentrations 3-200 (r > 0.995) for NT and 3-600 ng/mL (r > 0.995) for CN. The intra- and inter-day precision values met the acceptance criteria. NT and CN are stable in the battery of stability studies viz., stock solution, bench-top and auto-sampler. This method was successfully utilized to validate a newly developed preclinical smoking model in mice. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 20% |
Germany | 1 | 20% |
India | 1 | 20% |
Italy | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 20% |
Researcher | 4 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
Unspecified | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 28% |