↓ Skip to main content

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of measures of cervical sagittal rotation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of measures of cervical sagittal rotation
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-15-332
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheng-Dan Jiang, Jiang-Wei Chen, Yue-Hua Yang, Xiao-Dong Chen, Lei-Sheng Jiang

Abstract

Diagnosis and treatment decisions of cervical instability are made, in part, based on the clinician's assessment of sagittal rotation on flexion and extension radiographs. The objective of this study is to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of three measurement techniques in assessing cervical sagittal rotation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 10 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2014.
All research outputs
#17,728,060
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,890
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,075
of 254,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#43
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.