You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Patient participation in decisions about disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs: a cross-sectional survey
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-333 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ingrid Nota, Constance HC Drossaert, Erik Taal, Harald E Vonkeman, Mart AFJ van de Laar |
Abstract |
Involvement of patients in decision-making about medication is currently being advocated. This study examined (the concordance between) inflammatory arthritis patients' preferred and perceived involvement in decision-making in general, and in four specific decisions about Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs). Furthermore, this study examined how patients' involvement is related to satisfaction about decision-making and which factors are related to preferred roles, perceived roles and concordance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 2 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Canada | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 86 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 15% |
Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Other | 26 | 29% |
Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 33% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Psychology | 6 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2014.
All research outputs
#6,885,554
of 24,297,440 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,307
of 4,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,231
of 258,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#16
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,297,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.