↓ Skip to main content

Perceptions on healthy eating, physical activity and lifestyle advice: opportunities for adapting lifestyle interventions to individuals with low socioeconomic status

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceptions on healthy eating, physical activity and lifestyle advice: opportunities for adapting lifestyle interventions to individuals with low socioeconomic status
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea J Bukman, Dorit Teuscher, Edith J M Feskens, Marleen A van Baak, Agnes Meershoek, Reint Jan Renes

Abstract

Individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES) are generally less well reached through lifestyle interventions than individuals with higher SES. The aim of this study was to identify opportunities for adapting lifestyle interventions in such a way that they are more appealing for individuals with low SES. To this end, the study provides insight into perspectives of groups with different socioeconomic positions regarding their current eating and physical activity behaviour; triggers for lifestyle change; and ways to support lifestyle change.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 233 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 20%
Student > Master 37 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 65 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 34 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 14%
Social Sciences 24 10%
Psychology 15 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 72 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,646,453
of 24,688,240 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,266
of 16,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,070
of 259,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#66
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,688,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.