↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review of parenting interventions in European countries aiming to reduce social inequalities in children’s health and development

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review of parenting interventions in European countries aiming to reduce social inequalities in children’s health and development
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joana Morrison, Hynek Pikhart, Milagros Ruiz, Peter Goldblatt

Abstract

Early child development influences many aspects of wellbeing, health, competence in literacy and numeracy, criminality, and social and economic participation throughout the life course. Children from disadvantaged groups have less possibilities of achieving full development. By providing a positive start for all children across the social gradient, improved developmental outcomes will be seen during later childhood and throughout their lives. The objective of this systematic review was to identify interventions during early childhood in countries from the World Health Organisation European Region in 1999-2013 which reduced inequalities in children's health and development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 327 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 18%
Researcher 50 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Student > Bachelor 19 6%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 94 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 56 17%
Psychology 54 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 110 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,018,540
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,216
of 15,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,479
of 255,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#36
of 269 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 269 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.