↓ Skip to main content

Healthcare providers’ views on the acceptability of financial incentives for breastfeeding: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Healthcare providers’ views on the acceptability of financial incentives for breastfeeding: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbara Whelan, Kate J Thomas, Patrice Van Cleemput, Heather Whitford, Mark Strong, Mary J Renfrew, Elaine Scott, Clare Relton

Abstract

Despite a gradual increase in breastfeeding rates, overall in the UK there are wide variations, with a trend towards breastfeeding rates at 6-8 weeks remaining below 40% in less affluent areas. While financial incentives have been used with varying success to encourage positive health related behaviour change, there is little research on their use in encouraging breastfeeding. In this paper, we report on healthcare providers' views around whether using financial incentives in areas with low breastfeeding rates would be acceptable in principle. This research was part of a larger project looking at the development and feasibility testing of a financial incentive scheme for breastfeeding in preparation for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 106 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 19%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 21%
Social Sciences 12 11%
Psychology 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 35 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,518,245
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#684
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,063
of 257,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#11
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,700 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.