↓ Skip to main content

ERβ1: characterization, prognosis, and evaluation of treatment strategies in ERα-positive and -negative breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ERβ1: characterization, prognosis, and evaluation of treatment strategies in ERα-positive and -negative breast cancer
Published in
BMC Cancer, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan M Reese, Vera J Suman, Malayannan Subramaniam, Xianglin Wu, Vivian Negron, Anne Gingery, Kevin S Pitel, Sejal S Shah, Heather E Cunliffe, Ann E McCullough, Barbara A Pockaj, Fergus J Couch, Janet E Olson, Carol Reynolds, Wilma L Lingle, Thomas C Spelsberg, Matthew P Goetz, James N Ingle, John R Hawse

Abstract

The role and clinical value of ERbeta1 expression is controversial and recent data demonstrates that many ERbeta antibodies are insensitive and/or non-specific. Therefore, we sought to comprehensively characterize ERbeta1 expression across all sub-types of breast cancer using a validated antibody and determine the roles of this receptor in mediating response to multiple forms of endocrine therapy both in the presence and absence of ERalpha expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,793,641
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#576
of 8,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,091
of 254,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#10
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,278 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.