↓ Skip to main content

Making the post-MDG global health goals relevant for highly inequitable societies: findings from a consultation with marginalized populations in Guatemala

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making the post-MDG global health goals relevant for highly inequitable societies: findings from a consultation with marginalized populations in Guatemala
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-9276-13-57
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Lorena Ruano, Silvia Sánchez, Fernando José Jerez, Walter Flores

Abstract

The United Nations presented a set of Millennium Development Goals that aimed to improve social and economic development and eradicate poverty by 2015. Most low and middle-income countries will not meet these goals and today there is a need to set new development agenda, especially when it comes to health. The paper presents the findings from a community consultation process carried out within the Goals and Governance for Global Health (GO4Health) research consortium in Guatemala, which aims to identify community needs and expectations around public policies and health services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 <1%
Unknown 119 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 31 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 25%
Social Sciences 19 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,848,721
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,232
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,226
of 268,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.