You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
SEED: a tool for disseminating systematic review data into Wikipedia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-017-0607-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lena Schmidt, Johannes Friedel, Clive E. Adams |
| Abstract |
Wikipedia, the free-content online encyclopaedia, contains many heavily accessed pages relating to healthcare. Cochrane systematic reviews contain much high-grade evidence but dissemination into Wikipedia has been slow. New skills are needed to both translate and relocate data from Cochrane reviews to implant into Wikipedia pages. This letter introduces a programme to greatly simplify the process of disseminating the summary of findings of Cochrane reviews into Wikipedia pages. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 178 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 17% |
| Canada | 24 | 13% |
| United States | 15 | 8% |
| Australia | 7 | 4% |
| Germany | 7 | 4% |
| France | 6 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 6 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 100 | 56% |
| Scientists | 50 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 41% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 24% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#402,230
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#41
of 2,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,412
of 339,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#3
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.