↓ Skip to main content

Arthroscopic treatment of chronically painful calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Medical Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Arthroscopic treatment of chronically painful calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris
Published in
European Journal of Medical Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/2047-783x-18-49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xu Peng, Yong Feng, Guangxing Chen, Liu Yang

Abstract

Relatively large calcific tendinitis with persistent symptoms after extended periods of conservative treatment is an indication for operative therapy. Arthroscopy, as a treatment for calcific tendinitis of the hip abductors and calcinosis circumscripta, has been described previously; however, to our knowledge, the clinical and radiological response to arthroscopic removal of calcific tendinitis of the rectus femoris tendon has not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Researcher 7 13%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Medical Research
#583
of 923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,939
of 315,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Medical Research
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.