↓ Skip to main content

First draft genome sequence of a strain belonging to the Zoogloea genus and its gene expression in situ

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Microbiome, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First draft genome sequence of a strain belonging to the Zoogloea genus and its gene expression in situ
Published in
Environmental Microbiome, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40793-017-0274-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emilie E. L. Muller, Shaman Narayanasamy, Myriam Zeimes, Cédric C. Laczny, Laura A. Lebrun, Malte Herold, Nathan D. Hicks, John D. Gillece, James M. Schupp, Paul Keim, Paul Wilmes

Abstract

The Gram-negative beta-proteobacterium Zoogloea sp. LCSB751 (LMG 29444) was newly isolated from foaming activated sludge of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. Here, we describe its draft genome sequence and annotation together with a general physiological and genomic analysis, as the first sequenced representative of the Zoogloea genus. Moreover, Zoogloea sp. gene expression in its environment is described using metatranscriptomic data obtained from the same treatment plant. The presented genomic and transcriptomic information demonstrate a pronounced capacity of this genus to synthesize poly-β-hydroxyalkanoate within wastewater.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 26%
Other 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Environmental Science 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,267,478
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Microbiome
#166
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,678
of 336,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Microbiome
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.