↓ Skip to main content

A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools: study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of a healthy canteen policy in Australian primary schools: study protocol
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13012-014-0147-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luke Wolfenden, Nicole Nathan, Christopher M Williams, Tessa Delaney, Kathryn L Reilly, Megan Freund, Karen Gillham, Rachel Sutherland, Andrew C Bell, Libby Campbell, Serene Yoong, Rebecca Wyse, Lisa M Janssen, Sarah Preece, Melanie Asmar, John Wiggers

Abstract

BackgroundThe implementation of healthy school canteen policies has been recommended as a strategy to help prevent unhealthy eating and excessive weight gain. Internationally, research suggests that schools often fail to implement practices consistent with healthy school canteen policies. Without a population wide implementation, the potential benefits of these policies will not be realised. The aim of this trial is to assess the effectiveness of an implementation intervention in increasing school canteen practices consistent with a healthy canteen policy of the New South Wales (NSW), Australia, government known as the `Fresh Tastes @ School NSW Healthy School Canteen Strategy¿.Methods/designThe parallel randomised trial will be conducted in 70 primary schools located in the Hunter region of New South Wales, Australia. Schools will be eligible to participate if they are not currently meeting key components of the healthy canteen policy. Schools will be randomly allocated after baseline data collection in a 1:1 ratio to either an intervention or control group using a computerised random number function in Microsoft Excel. Thirty-five schools will be selected to receive a multi-component intervention including implementation support from research staff, staff training, resources, recognition and incentives, consensus and leadership strategies, follow-up support and implementation feedback. The 35 schools allocated to the control group will not receive any intervention support as part of the research trial. The primary outcome measures will be i) the proportion of schools with a canteen menu that does not contain foods or beverages restricted from regular sale (`red¿ and `banned¿ items) and ii) the proportion of schools where healthy canteen items (`green¿ items) represent the majority (>50%) of products listed on the menu. Outcome data will be collected via a comprehensive menu audit, conducted by dietitians blind to group allocation. Intervention effectiveness will be assessed using logistic regression models adjusting for baseline values.DiscussionThe proposed trial will represent a novel contribution to the literature, being the first randomised trial internationally to examine the effectiveness of an intervention to facilitate implementation of a healthy canteen policy.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000311752.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 42 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 19%
Social Sciences 17 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 46 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,307,723
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,556
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,898
of 256,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#55
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.