You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prognostic value of poorly differentiated clusters in invasive breast cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-12-310 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ying Sun, Fenli Liang, Wei Cao, Kai Wang, Jianjun He, Hongyan Wang, Yili Wang |
Abstract |
Our study aimed to assess the prognostic value of poorly differentiated clusters (PDCs) in invasive breast cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 39% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,307,723
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#609
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,005
of 256,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#34
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.