↓ Skip to main content

Transposable element-assisted evolution and adaptation to host plant within the Leptosphaeria maculans-Leptosphaeria biglobosa species complex of fungal pathogens

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transposable element-assisted evolution and adaptation to host plant within the Leptosphaeria maculans-Leptosphaeria biglobosa species complex of fungal pathogens
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-891
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Grandaubert, Rohan GT Lowe, Jessica L Soyer, Conrad L Schoch, Angela P Van de Wouw, Isabelle Fudal, Barbara Robbertse, Nicolas Lapalu, Matthew G Links, Bénédicte Ollivier, Juliette Linglin, Valérie Barbe, Sophie Mangenot, Corinne Cruaud, Hossein Borhan, Barbara J Howlett, Marie-Hélène Balesdent, Thierry Rouxel

Abstract

Many plant-pathogenic fungi have a tendency towards genome size expansion, mostly driven by increasing content of transposable elements (TEs). Through comparative and evolutionary genomics, five members of the Leptosphaeria maculans-Leptosphaeria biglobosa species complex (class Dothideomycetes, order Pleosporales), having different host ranges and pathogenic abilities towards cruciferous plants, were studied to infer the role of TEs on genome shaping, speciation, and on the rise of better adapted pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 25%
Researcher 37 23%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 28 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 17%
Environmental Science 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 33 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,210,739
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,011
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,319
of 268,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#47
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.