↓ Skip to main content

Association between kidney intracapsular pressure and ultrasound elastography

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between kidney intracapsular pressure and ultrasound elastography
Published in
Critical Care, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13054-017-1847-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kianoush B. Kashani, Shennen A. Mao, Sami Safadi, Bruce P. Amiot, Jaime M. Glorioso, John C. Lieske, Scott L. Nyberg, Xiaoming Zhang

Abstract

Kidney congestion is a common pathophysiologic pathway of acute kidney injury (AKI) in sepsis and heart failure. There is no noninvasive tool to measure kidney intracapsular pressure (KIP) directly. We evaluated the correlation of KIP with kidney elasticity measured by ultrasound surface wave elastography (USWE). We directly measured transcatheter KIP in three pigs at baseline and after bolus infusion of normal saline, norepinephrine, vasopressin, dopamine, and fenoldopam; infiltration of 2-L peritoneal dialysis solution in the intra-abdominal space; and venous, arterial, and ureteral clamping. KIP was compared with USWE wave speed. Only intra-abdominal installation of peritoneal dialysis fluid was associated with significant change in KIP (mean (95% CI) increase, 3.7 (3.2-4.2)] mmHg; P < .001). Although intraperitoneal pressure and KIP did not differ under any experimental condition, bladder pressure was consistently and significantly greater than KIP under all circumstances (mean (95% CI) bladder pressure vs. KIP, 3.8 (2.9-4.) mmHg; P < .001). USWE wave speed significantly correlated with KIP (adjusted coefficient of determination, 0.71; P < .001). Estimate (95% CI) USWE speed for KIP prediction stayed significant after adjustment for KIP hypertension (-0.8 (- 1.4 to - 0.2) m/s; P = .008) whereas systolic and diastolic blood pressures were not significant predictors of KIP. In a pilot study of the swine model, we found ultrasound surface wave elastography speed is significantly correlated with transcatheter measurement of kidney intracapsular and intra-abdominal pressures, while bladder pressure overestimated kidney intracapsular pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Professor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 47%
Engineering 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,020,163
of 23,978,545 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,671
of 6,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,277
of 330,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#62
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,545 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.