↓ Skip to main content

The effects of antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese on neonatal health outcomes: the LIMIT randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese on neonatal health outcomes: the LIMIT randomised trial
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0163-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jodie M Dodd, Andrew J McPhee, Deborah Turnbull, Lisa N Yelland, Andrea R Deussen, Rosalie M Grivell, Caroline A Crowther, Gary Wittert, Julie A Owens, Jeffrey S Robinson, For the LIMIT Randomised Trial Group

Abstract

Overweight and obesity during pregnancy represents a considerable health burden. While research has focused on interventions to limit gestational weight gain, there is little information describing their impact on neonatal health. Our aim was to investigate the effect on a range of pre-specified secondary neonatal outcomes of providing antenatal dietary and lifestyle advice to women who are overweight or obese.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 187 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 61 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Sports and Recreations 11 6%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 65 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,605,687
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,119
of 3,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,180
of 261,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#27
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.