↓ Skip to main content

Weight loss required by the severely obese to achieve clinically important differences in health-related quality of life: two-year prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weight loss required by the severely obese to achieve clinically important differences in health-related quality of life: two-year prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0175-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lindsey M Warkentin, Sumit R Majumdar, Jeffrey A Johnson, Calypse B Agborsangaya, Christian F Rueda-Clausen, Arya M Sharma, Scott W Klarenbach, Shahzeer Karmali, Daniel W Birch, Raj S Padwal

Abstract

Guidelines and experts describe 5% to 10% reductions in body weight as 'clinically important'; however, it is not clear if 5% to 10% weight reductions correspond to clinically important improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQL). Our objective was to calculate the amount of weight loss required to attain established minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in HRQL, measured using three validated instruments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 147 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 12 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 35 23%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Psychology 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 52 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,627,762
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,133
of 3,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,781
of 260,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#29
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.