You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Documentation framework for healthcare simulation quality improvement activities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-017-0053-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie Barlow, Robyn Dickie, Catherine Morse, Donna Bonney, Robert Simon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 5 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 23% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,720,614
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#78
of 270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,508
of 333,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 270 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.