↓ Skip to main content

Curcumin inhibits breast cancer stem cell migration by amplifying the E-cadherin/β-catenin negative feedback loop

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Curcumin inhibits breast cancer stem cell migration by amplifying the E-cadherin/β-catenin negative feedback loop
Published in
Stem Cell Research & Therapy, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/scrt506
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shravanti Mukherjee, Minakshi Mazumdar, Samik Chakraborty, Argha Manna, Shilpi Saha, Poulami Khan, Pushpak Bhattacharjee, Deblina Guha, Arghya Adhikary, Sanhita Mukhjerjee, Tanya Das

Abstract

The existence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) has been associated with tumor initiation, therapy-resistance, tumor relapse, angiogenesis and metastasis. Curcumin, a plant ployphenol, has several anti-tumor effects and has been shown to target CSCs. Here, we aimed at evaluating (i) the mechanisms underlying the aggravated migration potential of breast CSCs (bCSCs), and (ii) the effects of curcumin in modulating the same.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 23 15%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 34 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 34 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,637,636
of 22,766,595 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#202
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,611
of 255,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Research & Therapy
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,766,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.